Land Rover Range Rover 1989 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1985
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 4.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 121 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 284 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.5 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 15 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover is 27 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 13.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |