Land Rover Range Rover 1989 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1990
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 121 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 284 NM | 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.5 seconds | 22 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 31 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 69 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 11.8 | |
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.75 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1200 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`430 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9800 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |