Land Rover Range Rover 1989 vs Jeep Wrangler 1987
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 121 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 284 NM | 290 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Jeep Wrangler is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 63 HP less power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Jeep Wrangler. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 7.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 15.5 | |
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 76 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 3.88 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 60 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 354 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1223 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 1`950 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9800 | 10 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |