Land Rover Range Rover 1998 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 40 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.5 | 16.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |