Land Rover Range Rover 1998 vs Mercedes ML 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 292 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 74 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.5 | 14.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 18.7 l/100km | 16.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |