Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 226 HP | 235 HP | |
Torque: | 377 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 9 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 16.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
800 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 250'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Jeep Commander | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`495 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |