Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Ford Explorer 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 226 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 19 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Ford Explorer. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 13.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 18.1 l/100km | 15.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Explorer, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`568 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |