Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 18 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.6 | 14.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 29 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |