Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 12 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.6 | 14.0 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 1997 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 46 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1011 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2033 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |