Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2003

 
Land Rover Range Rover
1994 - 1998
Volkswagen Touareg
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.0 Petrol4.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP310 HP
Torque: 320 NM410 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds8.1 seconds
Volkswagen Touareg is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 120 HP less power than Volkswagen Touareg, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volkswagen Touareg. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 15.614.5
The Volkswagen Touareg is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 165 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway900 km on highway
Volkswagen Touareg gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.75 m
Width: 1.89 m1.93 m
Height: 1.82 m1.73 m
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller, but higher.
Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touareg, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1570 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touareg.
Gross weight (kg): 3`5002`945
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 34003600
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Touareg has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv