Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 3 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 15 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.3 | 13.1 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 480 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1992 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 21 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |