Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 34 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.3 | 15.6 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 830 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
| |