Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1995

 
Land Rover Range Rover
1994 - 1998
Chevrolet Blazer
1995 - 1997
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 4.0 Petrol4.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP193 HP
Torque: 320 NM353 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds10.1 seconds
Chevrolet Blazer is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 3 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 16.313.6
The Chevrolet Blazer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 405 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle500 km in combined cycle
790 km on highway610 km on highway
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.64 m
Width: 1.89 m1.81 m
Height: 1.82 m1.61 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 21 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Blazer.
Gross weight (kg): 3`5002`400
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 4000no data
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Chevrolet Blazer has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv