Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 193 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 353 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Chevrolet Blazer is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 3 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 33 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.3 | 13.6 | |
The Chevrolet Blazer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.61 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 8 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 21 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Blazer. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`400 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |