Land Rover Range Rover 1998 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 5 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 45 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 16.0 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |