Land Rover Range Rover 1998 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touareg is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 125 HP less power than Volkswagen Touareg, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volkswagen Touareg. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 14.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Touareg is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touareg, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1570 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touareg. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Volkswagen Touareg has
| |