Land Rover Range Rover 1998 vs Mercedes ML 2002

 
Land Rover Range Rover
1998 - 2002
Mercedes ML
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.0 Petrol3.7 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 185 HP245 HP
Torque: 340 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds8.7 seconds
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 60 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 15.314.1
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres83 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle580 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway750 km on highway
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km500'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes ML engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years10 years
Engine spread: Used also on Land Rover DiscoveryInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes S klase, Mercedes SL
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.64 m
Width: 1.89 m1.84 m
Height: 1.82 m1.82 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`5003`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 40003000
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mercedes ML has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv