Land Rover Range Rover 1998 vs Ford Explorer 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 22 HP less power than Ford Explorer, but torque is 1 NM more than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 13.7 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 10 cm shorter than the Ford Explorer, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Explorer, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`568 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |