Land Rover Range Rover 1998 vs BMW X5 2003

 
Land Rover Range Rover
1998 - 2002
BMW X5
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.0 Petrol4.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 185 HP320 HP
Torque: 340 NM440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds7 seconds
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 135 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 100 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 15.313.0
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 345 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres93 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway930 km on highway
BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km440'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years9 years
Engine spread: Used also on Land Rover DiscoveryInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW 6 sērija
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.67 m
Width: 1.89 m1.87 m
Height: 1.82 m1.71 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm longer than the BMW X5, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data465 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1550 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the BMW X5.
Gross weight (kg): 3`5002`700
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 34005400
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • lower price
BMW X5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv