Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 11 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 22 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 12.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |