Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 20 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 30 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 46 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1315 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |