Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 22 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 46 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 11.8 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 12 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota 4-Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 22 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 20 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`500 kg | 2`430 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |