Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 11 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, but torque is 25 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 12.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota 4-Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota 4-Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 14 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2257 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |