Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Nissan Terrano 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 278 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
Nissan Terrano is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 11 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, but torque is 8 NM less than Nissan Terrano. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm longer than the Nissan Terrano, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 115 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1900 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |