Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Nissan Terrano 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | no data | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 19.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 35 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Nissan Terrano. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 530'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Terrano engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 22 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm longer than the Nissan Terrano, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |