Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Mercedes ML 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 27 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes ML engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 12 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |