Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Lexus RX 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 65 HP less power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 8.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 13.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 13 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1725 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.3 metres less than that of the Lexus RX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Lexus RX has
| |