Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Land Rover Discovery 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 23 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.91 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 23 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1970 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |