Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Hyundai Terracan 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Terracan is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 14 HP less power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Hyundai Terracan. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Terracan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Kia Carnival | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Terracan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover and Hyundai Terracan are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1955 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |