Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Ford Maverick 1996

 
Land Rover Range Rover
1995 - 2002
Ford Maverick
1996 - 1998
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.7 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP125 HP
Torque: 270 NM278 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.5 seconds16.7 seconds
Ford Maverick is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 11 HP more power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 8 NM less than Ford Maverick. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.410.5
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 90 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway770 km on highway
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.66 m
Width: 1.89 m1.76 m
Height: 1.82 m1.85 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower.
Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Maverick, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 3`5002`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 34002200
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Maverick has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv