Land Rover Range Rover 1995 vs Ford Maverick 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 278 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
Ford Maverick is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 11 HP more power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 8 NM less than Ford Maverick. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 | 10.5 | |
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 5 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Maverick, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |