Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Nissan Patrol 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 252 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 18.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Nissan Patrol. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 2 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 25 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 605 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 9600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |