Land Rover Range Rover 1994 vs Mercedes ML 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 27 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes ML engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |