Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 51 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 14.9 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija | Used also on Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |