Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 310 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touareg is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 28 HP less power than Volkswagen Touareg, but torque is 30 NM more than Volkswagen Touareg. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 14.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Touareg is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Touareg gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touareg, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1570 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`945 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Touareg has
| |