Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Porsche Cayenne 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 32 HP more power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 13.5 | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 17 cm longer than the Porsche Cayenne, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1770 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |