Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Mercedes ML 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 32 HP more power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 120 NM less than Mercedes ML. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 10.9 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 5.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 795 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase, Mercedes G klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 31 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |