Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Lexus GX 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 44 HP more power than Lexus GX, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Lexus GX. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 14.7 | |
|
The Lexus GX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus GX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus GX engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija | Used also on Lexus LX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover is 6 cm longer than the Lexus GX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1238 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2513 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.8 metres less than that of the Lexus GX, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Lexus GX has
| |