Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover 2002 engine produces 24 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover 2005, but torque is 15 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover 2005. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 14.9 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover 2002 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover 2002 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover 2005 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover 2002 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover 2002 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover 2002 and Land Rover Range Rover 2005 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |