Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2002 - 2005
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.4 Petrol4.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 282 HP300 HP
Torque: 440 NM425 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds8.9 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 18 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, but torque is 15 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 16.214.9
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 195 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres86 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 610 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 460'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērijaInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.95 m4.79 m
Width: 1.96 m1.93 m
Height: 1.82 m1.78 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 16 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`500no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 54006600
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv