Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Ford Explorer 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 344 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 70 HP more power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Ford Explorer. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 13.0 | |
|
The Ford Explorer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 480 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 14 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 13 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 391 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |