Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Dodge Durango 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 44 HP more power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Dodge Durango. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 15.4 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm longer than the Dodge Durango, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2482 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |