Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Dodge Durango 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 282 HP | 349 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 509 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 67 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 69 NM less than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 14.6 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 15 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 532 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |