Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 12 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1700 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`500 kg | 2`810 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |