Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Nissan Patrol 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 17 HP more power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Patrol. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Patrol is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Terrano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 5.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 810 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2226 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |