Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Mercedes ML 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 14 HP more power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 10 NM less than Mercedes ML. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 31 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |