Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Mercedes ML 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 13 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes R klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 17 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 551 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |