| |
Land Rover Range Rover
2002 - 2005
|
Land Rover Range Rover
2005 - 2006
|
| Gearbox: |
Automatic | Automatic |
| Engine: |
2.9 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel |
| Camshaft drive: |
Timing chain | Timing chain |
Performance |
| Power: |
177 HP | 174 HP |
| Torque: |
390 NM | 390 NM |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: |
13.6 seconds | 13.6 seconds |
|
Land Rover Range Rover 2002 engine produces 3 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover 2005, the torque is the same for both cars. |
Fuel consumption |
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): |
11.3 | 11.3 |
| Fuel tank capacity: |
100 litres | 100 litres |
| Full fuel tank distance: |
880 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. |
|
|
Drive type |
| Wheel drive type: |
All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) |
Engines |
| Average engine lifespan: |
480'000 km | 480'000 km |
|
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. |
| Engine production duration: |
4 years | 4 years |
Dimensions |
| Length: |
4.95 m | 4.95 m |
| Width: |
1.96 m | 1.96 m |
| Height: |
1.82 m | 1.82 m |
|
Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover 2002 and Land Rover Range Rover 2005 are practically the same length. |
| Trunk capacity: |
no data | 535 litres |
| Turning diameter: |
11.6 meters | 11.6 meters |
| Gross weight (kg): |
3`500 | 3`500 |
|
|
| Safety: |
| no data |
| Quality: |
no data | no data |
| Average price (€): |
5400 | 6400 |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
|
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
|