Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2002 - 2005
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.9 Diesel3.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 177 HP275 HP
Torque: 390 NM640 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.6 seconds9.2 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 98 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 250 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.311.1
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres84 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 880 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.95 m4.79 m
Width: 1.96 m1.93 m
Height: 1.82 m1.76 m
Land Rover Range Rover is larger.
Land Rover Range Rover is 16 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data960 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`5003`500
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 56005600
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv