Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 3.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 275 HP | |
Torque: | 390 NM | 640 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 98 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 250 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 11.1 | |
Land Rover Range Rover consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 84 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 4.79 m | |
Width: | 1.96 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.82 m | 1.76 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 16 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 3 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 960 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5600 | 5600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |