Land Rover Range Rover 2002 vs Ford Explorer 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 4.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Explorer) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 295 HP | |
| Torque: | 390 NM | 406 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Explorer is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 118 HP less power than Ford Explorer, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Ford Explorer. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 14.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Explorer, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover is 4 cm longer than the Ford Explorer, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 385 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Ford Explorer has
| |