Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 396 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 560 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover engine produces 195 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 253 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 13.2 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover is larger. Land Rover Range Rover is 20 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 535 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover has 443 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |