Land Rover Range Rover 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2010

 
Land Rover Range Rover
2006 - 2009
Land Rover Range Rover
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.2 Petrol4.4 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 396 HP313 HP
Torque: 560 NM700 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 seconds7.8 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover 2006 is more dynamic to drive.
Land Rover Range Rover 2006 engine produces 83 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover 2010, but torque is 140 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover 2010. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 16.09.4
The Land Rover Range Rover 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Land Rover Range Rover 2006 consumes 6.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover 2006 could require 990 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 100 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
Land Rover Range Rover 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover 2010 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years10 years
Engine spread: Used also on Land Rover Range Rover SportUsed also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover 2010 might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Land Rover Range Rover 2010 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.95 m4.97 m
Width: 1.96 mno data
Height: 1.82 mno data
Trunk capacity: 535 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.6 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 3`5003`200
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 720015 200
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more power
  • lower price
Land Rover Range Rover has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv